| |
| Grace |
|
Upstart

Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 8:56 am Post subject: |
| |
Whoops! Sorry, Mel. I said "Fanny's brother-in-law." Robert was her brother. _________________ Writing and Re-Writing,
Grace |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Melpomene |
|
Poor Relation

Joined: 15 Sep 2008 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:56 am Post subject: |
| |
| I wouldn't know, I haven't watched that movie in a long time. Thanks, though! I hope I have no more trivial or weird questions to ask until the next scene--according to No Plot? No Problem! I should have reached ten thousand words on my NaNoWriMo novel yesterday, and I'm at three thousand... |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Melpomene |
|
Poor Relation

Joined: 15 Sep 2008 Posts: 95
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:08 am Post subject: Re: rank over gender |
| |
Two hundred words later...
| Grace wrote: |
Her Answer:
Actually, the woman was always presented to the man, especially if his rank is higher than yours. |
Isn't there an example to the contrary in "An Infamous Army?" I forget his name...but he got a friend to introduce him to Lady Barbara Childe. Is this because her rank was higher than his? And now that I'm so confused...what if they're equal in rank? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Candice |
|
Queen of the Board

Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 2731 Location: Minneapolis, MN
|
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:22 am Post subject: |
| |
It's the manner of introduction that is important. The lower ranking person is always presented TO the higher ranking person, eg: "Your Grace, may I present Miss Darling" but NEVER "Miss Darling, may I present Her Grace the Duchess of Devonshire". _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Grace |
|
Upstart

Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:15 am Post subject: formal announcing at balls |
| |
I have been told that those titled get announced at balls by their highest ranking title. This I get. But, I have two questions about how announcing worked.
1. Would it be "His grace, the duke of PlaceName and Her grace the duchess of PlaceName" or rather shortened and a little more casual? "The duke and duchess of PlaceName"
2. Would you include "Dowager" in the title being used by the announcer at the ball?
Thanks, Kids!  _________________ Writing and Re-Writing,
Grace |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Candice |
|
Queen of the Board

Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 2731 Location: Minneapolis, MN
|
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:20 am Post subject: Re: formal announcing at balls |
| |
| Grace wrote: | | 1. Would it be "His grace, the duke of PlaceName and Her grace the duchess of PlaceName" or rather shortened and a little more casual? "The duke and duchess of PlaceName" |
The former is probably more precisely correct, but I'm sure the latter version would also be acceptable at certain events.
| Grace wrote: | | 2. Would you include "Dowager" in the title being used by the announcer at the ball? |
No. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Grace |
|
Upstart

Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:30 am Post subject: |
| |
MORE ON ANNOUNCING AT BALLS...
1. What about a marquess? Is it:
"The Marquess and Marchioness of PlaceName"
or
"The Marquess PlaceName and the Marchioness PlaceName"
or
"His lordship, the Marquess of PlaceName and Her ladyship, the Marchioness of PlaceName"
3. Going with the above examples, do you need to include "His lordship" on Earl and Marquess, being upper aristocracy?
4. On viscount and baron, is it:
"Lord LastName and Lady LastName"
5. Last one. If a duchess and marquess decide to enter a ball together, is this correct?:
"Her grace, the duchess of PlaceName and His lordship the marquess of PlaceName"
Whew! THANK YOU!
P.S. - I know, Kalen, I'm being seriously nitpicky, aren't I? But once I get it down, I can stop that.  _________________ Writing and Re-Writing,
Grace |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Candice |
|
Queen of the Board

Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 2731 Location: Minneapolis, MN
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:27 am Post subject: |
| |
| Grace wrote: | MORE ON ANNOUNCING AT BALLS...
1. What about a marquess? Is it:
"The Marquess and Marchioness of PlaceName"
or
"The Marquess PlaceName and the Marchioness PlaceName"
or
"His lordship, the Marquess of PlaceName and Her ladyship, the Marchioness of PlaceName" |
I haven't yet unearthed by books on titles and forms of address so I have no idea which way is absolutely correct. I doubt your readers will, either. Go with whathever sounds right to you. My preference would be #1, but that's just me and based on no specific knowledge.
| Grace wrote: | | 3. Going with the above examples, do you need to include "His lordship" on Earl and Marquess, being upper aristocracy? |
Again, I don't know for sure, but I doubt it.
| Grace wrote: | 4. On viscount and baron, is it:
"Lord LastName and Lady LastName" |
My guess would be Lord and Lady Titlename.
| Grace wrote: | 5. Last one. If a duchess and marquess decide to enter a ball together, is this correct?:
"Her grace, the duchess of PlaceName and His lordship the marquess of PlaceName" |
Sounds good to me.
Without my copy of Black's, I am depending on this site which is pretty thorough regarding forms of address: http://laura.chinet.com//html/titles12.html _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| KeiraSoleore |
|
Moderator Princess

Joined: 03 Oct 2006 Posts: 5898 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:19 pm Post subject: |
| |
| Candice wrote: | | Grace wrote: | 1. What about a marquess? Is it:
"The Marquess and Marchioness of PlaceName"
or
"The Marquess PlaceName and the Marchioness PlaceName"
or
"His lordship, the Marquess of PlaceName and Her ladyship, the Marchioness of PlaceName" |
I haven't yet unearthed by books on titles and forms of address so I have no idea which way is absolutely correct. I doubt your readers will, either. Go with whathever sounds right to you. My preference would be #1, but that's just me and based on no specific knowledge. |
The first example for all the noble couples. _________________ Medieval & Regency Writer
keirasoleore.blogspot.com
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Grace |
|
Upstart

Joined: 24 Jun 2008 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:59 pm Post subject: |
| |
Keira,
Totally off the subject, I'm in love with your picture! An Asian regency beauty. Very pretty.  _________________ Writing and Re-Writing,
Grace |
|
| Back to top |
|
| KeiraSoleore |
|
Moderator Princess

Joined: 03 Oct 2006 Posts: 5898 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:40 pm Post subject: |
| |
Thanks, Grace. I think I found her on a layered vintage card somehwere and took just the top. _________________ Medieval & Regency Writer
keirasoleore.blogspot.com
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| wentworth |
|
Landed Gentry

Joined: 27 Jan 2009 Posts: 108 Location: Sweet Home, Oregon
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:35 pm Post subject: Awkward situation |
| |
Hello dear people,
I am at the vital 'hero first meets heroine' part. It's a bit of an unusual situation in that there is no one to make the introduction...The heroine has fallen and the hero, realizing she would not appreciate being 'swooped up' and not a real 'swooping up' kind of guy, feels that the best thing would be to inject as much normality into the awkward meeting as possible.
He approaches heroine, bows, and introduces himself and extends his hand to lift her up.
Question does the sequence sound right or should he introduce himself then bow or does he only bow to her when she introduces herself (after she has been helped to her feet).
And she, being the proper miss, after she is helped up to her feet, would she curtsy then introduce herself, or introduce herself then curtsy.
The curtsy is the polite acknowledgement of the person being introduced to...but I am not sure of the sequence of events.
I know this is nit-picky but hero is a very proper gentleman and he would not get it wrong. I'm trying to grock my brain around the scene, and it stumbles here for lack of info.
Thank you for any help in this direction,
Wentworth _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Nancy |
|
Upstart
Joined: 16 Oct 2008 Posts: 12 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:40 pm Post subject: bowing and scraping |
| |
The etiquette books I have read ( from a later period than the Regency) all say that while a lesser rank is presented to the superior rank, a gentleman is always presented to a lady. That is the lady always has the right to refuse to accept an introduction.
Even if a lady accepts an introduction at a dance the gentleman never presumes to think that this is a blanket acceptance of his acquaintance. She has to acknowledge him first the next time they meet.
Duelling etiquette books at dawn?
Nancy |
|
| Back to top |
|
| wentworth |
|
Landed Gentry

Joined: 27 Jan 2009 Posts: 108 Location: Sweet Home, Oregon
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:50 pm Post subject: This is what I had thought |
| |
My dear Nancy,
Thank you for your answer, I guess what I am asking is what if there is no one around (yes! horrors!) to make the introduction. It seems too weird for my hero to just extend his hand without saying anything.
Your humble servant,
Wentworth _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| KeiraSoleore |
|
Moderator Princess

Joined: 03 Oct 2006 Posts: 5898 Location: Seattle
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:24 pm Post subject: Re: bowing and scraping |
| |
| Nancy wrote: | | Duelling etiquette books at dawn? |
"You spoke to my so-n-so without her first acknowledging you. Will it be pistols or rapiers at dawn?" _________________ Medieval & Regency Writer
keirasoleore.blogspot.com
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Choose Display Order |
|
| User Permissions |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Skin Created by: Sigma12 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
 |