La Belle Assemblée, June 1809.
On the rare occasion, and this is one, the description of a print in a magazine disagrees with the way the ensemble is depicted in the print. Clearly the prints were produced before the descriptive text was written, but there must have been some sort of editorial collaboration between the artist and the magazine. In this case, and a handful of others, the fashion editors seem less than pleased with what the artist delivered. Despite their minor grievances, I think this is quite a lovely print!
The print is described in the magazine as follows:
“A round high gown of fine French cambric, made a walking length, and finished at the feet with lace and needlework; Union front, and plaited collar, ornamented with the same. Elastic girdle with buckle or clasp of gold or cut steel. A Turkish coat of clear worked muslin, leno, or patent net, trimmed entirely round with scalloped lace, with appliqued seams of the same; and lined with apricot, pale salmon, or primrose sarsnet; flowing open in front of the figure, in form of the Turkish robe, with a deep lappelled cape. A Wardel hat of fine straw, with conical or beehive crown, ornamented with some delicately contrasted flower. Chinese parasol of lilac sarsnet, with deep Eastern awning. Shoes and gloves of pea green kid. We take occasion to remark that the trimming up of the hat should be more convex, and a little deeper in front, and that it should be worn more to one side, and forward in front. The parasol strikes us as being more correct when chosen of the same colour as the lining of the Coat of the shoes.”